Solomon's Treasure SOURCEBOOK - Book - Page 156
154
THE SEARCH FOR KING SOLOMON’S TREASURE SOURCEBOOK
157
159
NOTE: We use this as this is a perfect example of what
is called scholarship but merely represents scoffing in ignorance. Cabot sailed for England and that is not up for
debate. However, why would they attack his record? That is
because he sailed for the Spanish after leaving Britain and
to locate Ophir and Tarshish in Southeast Asia just North of
Moluccas and South of Japan and China. Not really difficult
but notice that is not British territory. It is not Malaysia nor
India for certain and their claims proven wrong by their own.
However, this is the kind of muddying of the waters that
continues in British scholarship because it is the only tactic
they have to discredit and confuse because they cannot
prove any of their shallow claims. They cannot disprove the
Spanish documentation nor have they really attempted to
so they attempt to discredit one who proves them wrong.
It is deflection. This book however will cause them to deal
with the weight of this overwhelming evidence and expect
they will be continuing the same tactics as they have nothing in way of truth to build a foundation for a case. Let’s see
what the British Encyclopedia has to say.
157. Philippine Progress Prior to 1898 . By Austin Craig and Conrado Benitez. Of the College of Liberal Arts Faculty
of the University of the Philippines. Philippine Education Co., Inc., Manila, 1916. P. 92. Citing Works on Conjectural
Anthropology, Former Prime Minister Pedro A. Paterno. Mojares 2006, p. 85.
https://quod.lib.umich.edu/p/philamer/ASF9826.0001.001?rgn=main;view=fulltext
159. “The Reputation of Sebastian Cabot”. By Ruddock, Alwyn A. (1974). Institute of Historical Research. University
of London. 47: 95–99. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1468-2281.1974.tb02183.x
