2 ESDRAS: The Hidden Book of Prophecy With 1st Esdras - Book - Page 42
I N T R O D U C T I O N
1 Esdras 8:19 -21
And I, king Artaxerxes, have also commanded the keepers of the treasures in Syria and
Phoenicia, that whatsoever Ezra the priest, and the reader of the law of the Most High
Elohim shall send for, they should give to him with speed, 20 To the sum of an hundred
talents of silver: likewise also of wheat even to an hundred cors, and an hundred pieces of
wine, and other things in abundance. Let all things be performed after the law of Elohim
diligently unto the Most High Elohim, that wrath come not upon the kingdom of the King
and his sons.
How is it that King Artaxerxes, the Persian king, knew “Most High” for Yahuah
yet Esther cannot seem to pray to Him, give Him credit, nor acknowledge Him? Is
this not supposed to be scripture? She is clearly applying Pharisee/Samaritan doctrine
especially not pronouncing nor even mentioning YHWH. This also disproves that the
Yahudim were being persecuted in a nation which protected them by royal decree even
for at least three generations. Artaxerxes did not proclaim such and then turn around
and set up a mafia scandal to take back from the Yahudim in which he freed and his
father even renewed such pledge assisting them to complete the Second Temple even.
Artaxerxes decreed the final migration of the return of the Lost Tribes which occurred
the same year before Esther even entered his palace in her story. He favored Ezra and
gave him all of his requests including a mandate to restore the law of Yahuah not just
in Yerusalem but in Syria and Phoenicia (Samaria). However, we are then to believe he
forgot what a Hebrew was, forgot he committed even significant financial resources to
them specifically to restore Yah’s law only to turn against them in ignorance because
some advisor hated Jews. Note that is not even a Hebrew word being forced into
scripture in fraud as it is Yahudim or Yah’s for short, never Jews except in Yiddish
infusion changing the language of the Bible.
The incredible leap over planets into another universe by scholars claiming Bagasro
must be Mordecai, Esther’s Uncle, fails any test of logic. There is no such etymology
nor association in name. Certainly, Mordecai was protected and such warning was
given in Esther. However, the assumption that represents the only time such warning
occurs even in Persia by that king is erroneous. In 1st Esdras, there is a very similar
relationship with Zerubabel and King Darius in which a similar declaration is made.
Three bodyguards of the king enter into a contest in which the winner will be given in
reward royal robes, protected by the king, given from the treasury even, etc. The winner
is Zerubabel and he received an edict of overwhelming support in a true Bible story
returning to Yerusalem to continue construction on the Second Temple with the second
wave of Southern Kingdom Lost Tribes.
In assessing the different names especially in the Latin, it is not rare for 1st or 2nd
Esdras to render names even in the 1611 King James Version somewhat scrambled and
40
