Best practices book - Flipbook - Page 7
d. 500,000 or State Capitol (Title Page) pg.153
i. Development Services Steering Committee (City of Denver, CO) pg.154
ii. Publish Standard Operating Procedures (City of San Antonio, TX) pg.156
iii. Quality Control Program (City of San Antonio, TX) pg.157
5. PERMITTING (Title Page)........................................................................................................159
a. Up to 100,000 (Title Page) (This section left blank for future content) pg.160
b. 100,001 to 249,999 (Title Page) (This section left blank for future content) pg.161
c. 250,000 to 499,999 (Title Page) (This section left blank for future content) pg.162
d. 500,000 or State Capitol (Title Page) pg.163
i. 180 Day Permit Process (City of Jacksonville, FL) pg.164
ii. Customized Permitting Process (City of Salem, OR) pg.197
iii. Temporary Power Pole Flat Rate Process (City of Jacksonville, FL) pg.200
6. PLAN REVIEW (Title Page).......................................................................................................204
a. Up to 100,000 (Title Page) (This section left blank for future content) pg.205
b. 100,001 to 249,999 (Title Page) (This section left blank for future content) pg.206
c. 250,000 to 499,999 (Title Page) pg.207
i. Electronic Plan Review (City of Plano, TX) pg.208
d. 500,000 or State Capitol (Title Page) pg.213
i. 10-Day Guarantee Turn Around for Single Family Dwelling (City of Salem, OR) pg.214
ii. Accelerated Plan Review Guide (Department of Consumer and Regulatory Affairs,
Washington, DC) pg.219
iii. Clark County Shear Wave Velocity Map (Clark County, NV) pg.239
iv. Completeness and Assignment Review Team (City of San Antonio, TX) pg.241
v. Fire Personnel Plans Examiner (City of Salem, OR) pg.243
vi. Interactive Checklist for Inspection and Plan Reviews (City of Jacksonville, FL) pg.245
vii. Plan Review Round Table Meeting Procedure (City of Salem, OR) pg.250
viii. Posting of Plan Review and Inspection Results (City of San Antonio, TX) pg.256
7. INSPECTION (Title Page).........................................................................................................257
a. Up to 100,000 (Title Page) (This section left blank for future content) pg.258
b. 100,001 to 249,999 (Title Page) pg.259
i. Geographic Assigned Areas Inspection Service Map (City of Kelowna, BC, Canada) pg.260
c. 250,000 to 499,999 (Title Page) pg.262
i. In-House Inspector Training Program (City of Plano, TX) pg.263
ii. Inspection Resulted Automatic Broadcast E-mail (City of Aurora, IL) pg.265
d. 500,000 or State Capitol (Title Page) pg.268
i. Collaborative Inspection Group (CIG) (City of Denver, CO) pg.269
ii. Complex Commercial Field Operations Plan (City of San Antonio, TX) pg.273
iii. Customer Service Audits (Clark County, NV) pg.278
iv. Inspections Mobile Device Deployment (City of San Antonio, TX) pg.288
v. Inspections Route Optimization (City of San Antonio, TX) pg.289
vi. Inspectors Take Home Vehicle Policy (City of Oklahoma City, OK) pg.291
vii. Interactive Checklist for Inspections and Plan Review (City of Jacksonville, FL) pg.293
viii. Mobile Inspection Web-based Application (City of San Antonio, TX) pg.298
ix. Posting of Plan Review and Inspection Results (City of San Antonio, TX) pg.300
vii
