2022 PHILIPPINE RESPONSE - Report - Page 94
MONITORING, SUPERVISION AND EVALUATION OF TRAINING AND ASSESSMENT
PHILIPPINE MEASURES
KEY AREA 2
Immediate Measures
1.
CHED-MARINA
notified
the
University
of
Cebu,
BIT
International College, Cristal ECollege, PNTC Colleges, Our Lady
of Fatima University, and John B.
Lacson
Foundation
Maritime
University (Attachment 34) of the
specific findings noted in the
ECAR. The MHEIs were required to
explain and give comments on the
findings and to submit a corrective
action plan to address the findings
and prevent recurrence.
●
On 28 January 2022, the University
of
Cebu
(Attachment
34-B)
submitted compliance documents
which
were
subsequently
reviewed and evaluated. The
Nav225 Syllabus indicates a total of
twenty (20) practical exercises
(EPLANs 1, 2, 3A, 3B, 3C, 3, 4A, 4B,
4C, 4, 5A, 5B, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10A, 10B and
10) and the corresponding Exercise
Plans
(20)
were
provided.
However, it is not indicated if this
number of practical exercises were
reduced
from
what
EMSA
discovered as 26 at the time of their
inspection. As such UC-METC
needs to provide explanation as to
how EMSA was able to state that
there were 26 practical sessions
that should have been conducted
from Nov. 2019 to Feb. 2020.
Therefore, based on the factual
evidence
submitted,
the
evaluation team concludes that
the specific finding has not been
sufficiently addressed.
88
The course requires 6 lab hours per
week based on the syllabus and
the Course Specifications (CMO 14,
s.2018). However, all practical
exercises have a total duration of
45 minutes only which are to be
“carried out and performed
individually at home” using table,
parallel ruler/protractor triangle,
technical compass, chart, pencil
and eraser. Therefore, based on the
factual evidence submitted, the
evaluation team concludes that
the specific finding has not been
sufficiently addressed.
●
Based
on
the
submitted
documents of Our Lady of Fatima
University (OLFU) (Attachment 34C) on 27 January 2022, it was noted
that the Policies and Procedures
on Carrying Capacity were not
provided, preventing the thorough
verification of the action taken by
the MHEI. Therefore, based on the
factual evidence submitted, the
evaluation team concludes that
the specific finding has not been
sufficiently addressed.
